Legal Opinion

Haggart v. Cho

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1997No. 02249PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County in favor of appellees, Dr. Doo W. Cho and Al-toona Hospital Center for Mental Health Services (the Hospital). In this ease, summary judgment was granted on the grounds that appellant’s cause of action was barred by the two-year statute of limitations and that the discovery rule did not toll the statute of limitations. Upon review, we affirm.

Herein, appellant, Betty J. Haggart, questions whether her cause of action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Appellant’s Brief p. vi. Haggart…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Walters v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Zeleznik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wilson v. El-DaiefSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Forshey v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Baselice v. Franciscan Friars Assumption BVM Province, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Hess v. Warwick Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API