Murdaugh Stuart Madden and Clifford J. Hynning v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PER CURIAM *
The present plaintiffs, two Washington lawyers, successfully prosecuted a claim on behalf of Industrial Finishers, Inc., an Ohio corporation, against the Cleveland Ordnance District (of the Army) for an equitable adjustment under a contract performed by Finishers for Cleveland Ordnance. They accepted the retainer on a contingency basis which was later amplified by an express agreement for 30 percent of the recovery. After they had established Finishers' right to an equitable adjustment in the amount of $34,000 (reflecting a fee of $10,200), the Small Business Administration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piggly Wiggly Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- General Casualty Company of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Pittman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Kearney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cecile Industries, Inc./ronald Lipshie, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Dick Cheney, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Project Map, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Burlington Northern Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Chapman v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
- JGB Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.