Legal Opinion
Conners v. Missouri Division of Family Services
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 1979No. 40175PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Administrative proceeding. Respondent’s Medical Review Team (hereinafter “M.R. T.”) denied claimant’s application for general relief and Medicaid. After an appeal hearing, respondent’s director found that claimant was neither unemployable nor disabled, the respective criteria for the two assistance programs. This appeal from the director’s decision followed.
The scope of our review is governed by V.A.M.S. § 208.100(5), directing us to inquire into “whether or not a fair hearing has been granted the applicant,” and by V.A.M.S.Const. Art. V, § 22, requiring a determination of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brooks v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Garrard v. State Department of Public Health & WelfareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Hill v. State Department of Public Health & WelfareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Tillman v. Wedge Mobile Service StationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bell v. Missouri State Division of Family ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Covington v. Missouri State Division of Family ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980