Legal Opinion

Fulton v. B. R. Baker-Toledo Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1934No. 24209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This case has already been before this court in Fulton , Supt. of Banks, v. B. R. Baker-Toledo Co., 125 Ohio St., 518, 182 N. E., 513, upon the question whether the draft owned by The B. R. Baker-Toledo Company constituted a preferred claim under the provisions of Section 713, General Code, and was entitled to a preference on all the assets of the bank. In that case the court held that the draft in question did constitute a preferred claim, and thereupon the superintendent of banks paid the principal amount of the claim without prejudice. The preferred creditor then amended his petition so as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. State Ex Rel. Bettman v. ChristenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Boston Penny Savings Bank v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Fulton v. B. R. Baker-Toledo Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jasinsky v. PottsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Squire v. American Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Columbus Equipment Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Systems Data, Inc. v. Visi Trak Corp.Akron Municipal Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API