Legal Opinion

Kominski v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 14, 1959No. 53, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, J.:

The writ of error in this case relates to numerous objections raised by appellant, acting as his own counsel, questioning the legality of his conviction upon the charge of robbery as defined in Title 11 Del. C. § 811. Appellant was tried with co-defendant, Ennis Joseph. Joseph was acquitted; appellant was convicted.

At the trial below and in a former appeal to this court, 141 A. 2d 138, arising out of the refusal of the Superior Court to discharge appellant by reason of the alleged failure of the State to try appellant upon the charge of which he was indicted at or prior to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kominski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. State v. IsaacsOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State v. KorotkiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Kominski v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API