Legal Opinion
Nixon v. Runyon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-5451PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hiena R. Nixon alleges that her former employer, the United States Postal Service, illegally discriminated against her on the basis of race and physical handicap, and illegally terminated her in retaliation for her filing a claim with the employer’s Equal Employment Office. The case was tried to the Court without a jury over the course of four days. This memorandum constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is a member of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kresefky v. Panasonic Communications & Systems Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Woods v. BentsenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Backof v. New Jersey State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Pashoian v. GTE DIRECTORIESDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Taylor v. Procter & Gamble Dover WipesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.