Swanson v. Smith
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Rufus F. Robinson, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan
This suit was tried on an agreed state of facts without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of defendants in error, Arthur Smith and George Scarlett.
The material facts are that one Hoops owned the horses, wagons and harness replevied, and prior to January, 1910, placed them in the livery stable of defendants in error and requested them to hoard and keep them, and for that purpose they remained in said stable until the beginning of this suit; that on April 9, 1910, Hoops duly executed and delivered to plaintiffs in error a chattel mortgage on said property to secure his debt of $2,565.40…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howes v. NewcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- National Bank of Commerce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Lynde v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Hoffman v. ParadisIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zahner Manufacturing Co. v. HarnishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930