Legal Opinion
In re Pace
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
H. Patrick Leis III, J.
By order to show cause, dated March 5, 1999, petitioners Mi*619chael and Mary Ann Pace commenced this proceeding pursuant to article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law for the appointment of a guardian of the person and property of their 29-year-old son, John Pace, who sustained a brain injury in a moped accident in 1985. John presently resides in a group home and attends day programs, both of which are funded through the Medicaid program.
The petitioners were appointed as coguardians of the person and property of their son after a hearing held on March 28,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Appointment of a Committee for the Person & Property of DietzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- DiGennaro v. Community Hospital of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re WeismanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re McMullenNew York Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re GreensteinNew York Supreme Court · 2003