Legal Opinion
Parmele v. Schroeder
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1901No. 9,084PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from the district court for Cass county. Heard below before Ramsey, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
We have heretofore decided that the appeal taken in this action should be dismissed because the decree as against the appellants was not final and, therefore, not appealable. Parmele v. Schroeder, 59 Nebr., 553. A motion for a rehearing, accompanied by a very able brief, led us to the conclusion that there was sufficient merit in the contention of appellants’ counsel to justify a reexamination of the question. We have taken pains to quite fully examine the authorities to rvhich our attention has been called by counsel on both sides of the controversy, and after a careful consideration of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Grant v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Dainese v. KendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parratt v. HartsuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Huffman v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Development Building & Loan Ass'n v. NurockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Vetter v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Continental-equitable Title & Trust Co. v. National Properties Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.