Rush v. Champlin Refining Company

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

This is the second appeal to this court •arising from the same numbered and styled case in the trial court. See Rush v. Champlin Refining Co. et al., Okl., 321 P.2d 697.

The controversy herein relates to the •meaning and effect of two deeds. These base deeds were executed by A. Plumley in 1925. The pertinent parts of such base deeds were set forth in Rush v. Champlin, etc., supra.

Rush and others, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, filed an action to quiet title to the lands covered by the base deeds. Plaintiffs deraigned their interests from Plumley. Defendants…