Bower v. Weisman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Frederick R. Weisman (“Weisman”), Frederick Weisman Co. (“FWC”) and Rare Properties, Inc. (“Rare Properties”) have moved for an order (i) staying this action pending determination of a related case in state court in California, (ii) dismissing for failure to state a claim the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Claims of the Third Amended Complaint as against all defendants pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6); and (iii) dismissing for failure to state a claim the Fifth Claim as against FWC and Rare Properties pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Defendant FWC…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Papa's-June Music, Inc. v. McLeanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Rodgers v. Roulette Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In Re Frederick R. Weisman, Sachiko T. Bower v. Frederick R. Weisman, Frederick Weisman Co., and Rare Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Pereira v. Binet (In Re Harvard Knitwear, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Kenevan v. Empire Blue Cross and Blue ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.