Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Safir
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 28, 2001No. CV-99-6396 (NG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
Once again, Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold has written a thorough and persuasive Report and Recommendation in this case. Plaintiffs objections to the Report rest principally on factual assertions as to the merits of his claims and an argument that the statute of limitations has not run because his claims are in effect fraud claims and therefore governed by a six-year statute of limitations. Plaintiffs objections are reviewed under the de novo standard of review provided by Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiffs complaint invokes this…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Manliguez v. JosephDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- United States v. HerronDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- HARGROVES v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Houraney v. Burton & Associates, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Riccio v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.