Legal Opinion
United States v. Roberto Bustos-Ochoa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2012No. 11-50471PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We must decide whether an alien charged with illegal reentry after deportation may collaterally attack his removal order by claiming that an immigration judge failed to advise him about relief for which he was statutorily ineligible.
I
Bustos-Ochoa, a native and citizen of Mexico, first entered the United States in 2002 without being admitted or inspected. Less than a year later, he was served with a Notice to Appear alleging that he was removable as “an alien present in the United States who has not been admitted or paroled.”
Prior to his removal hearing, Bustos-Ochoa had been convicted…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Marco Gonzalez-Valerio, AKA Marcos Valerio, AKA Marcos Gonzalez Valerio, AKA Marcos Gonzalez-ValerioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Rolando Cerda-PenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Irvin Sandoval-OrellanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Roberto Bustos-OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bustos-Ochoa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Braulio Gonzalez-TejedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Carlos VegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.