Legal Opinion
Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1989No. 88-452Published
1Opinion of the Court
777 P.2d 862 (1989)
Paul B. EASTMAN, Claimant and Appellant,
v.
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Employer, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 88-452.
Supreme Court of Montana.
Submitted on Briefs March 9, 1989.
Decided May 10, 1989.
Rehearing Denied August 31, 1989.
Paul B. Eastman, Kalispell, pro se.
Andrew J. Utick, Utick & Grosfield, Helena, for defendant and respondent.
WEBER, Justice.
The claimant, Paul Eastman, appeals from a final decision of the Workers' Compensation Court denying him benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act and affirming a compensation award of $10,000 under the Occupational Disease…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
- Cottrill v. Cottrill Sodding ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 1987
- Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.