Legal Opinion

In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 25, 2014No. 13-2498UnknownCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

A venerable legal Latinism, lex non cog-it ad impossibilia, teaches that the law does not compel the impossible. Guided by that august adage, we hold that a subpoena duces tecum compelling the production of documents to a now-defunct grand jury cannot be enforced by civil contempt sanctions before a successor grand jury, and we accordingly vacate the district court’s order holding the appellant in civil contempt. We reject, however, the appellant’s additional contentions that tribal sovereign immunity shielded it from subpoena and that the subpoena was unreasonably broad…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davidson v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. State ex rel. Peterson v. EbkeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. In Re Grand Jury ProceedingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. DequattroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API