Legal Opinion

Rose Marie O'DOwD and George O'DOwD v. South Central Bell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1984No. 83-3208PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs, Rose Marie O’Dowd 1 and George O’Dowd (“the O’Dowds”), brought suit under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“the Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq. (1976), against the defendant South Central Bell Telephone Company (“South Central”) to recover damages resulting from alleged violations of the Act. The district court dismissed by summary judgment the O’Dowds’ claim upon finding, inter alia, (1) that the O’Dowds, a white couple, had no cause of action under the Act because they did not fall into a legally-recognized minority protected by the Act, and (2) that, if…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Terry S. Fischl v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Manoria P. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Cherry v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  5. Mary L. McKenzie v. U.S. Home Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Flagship InternationalDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
  2. Dorton v. Kmart Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  3. Anderson v. Capital One BankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  4. Higgins v. JC Penney, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1986
  5. Jodie Collins III v. San Antonio Dodge Chrysler Jeep RamDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API