Legal Opinion

Smith v. Flagship International

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 22, 1985No. Civ. A. CA 3-83-0692-GPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

Sandi Smith brought this action seeking individual relief under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., and individual and class relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1981). Smith asserts these claims on behalf of herself and all females employed by the defendant since January 1, 1979, who have suffered sex discrimination in the terms and conditions of their employment.

The defendant, referred to herein as “Flagship,” moves for partial summary judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Korwek v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Robbin v. Fluor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Korwek v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Santerre v. Agip Petroleum Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  5. Korwek v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API