Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 2005No. C-050774PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} Relators, Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc., and Queensgate Terminals, L.L.C., have brought a verified petition for a writ of mandamus concerning a 30-acre piece of riverfront property along River Road in Cincinnati. Hilltop and Queensgate contend that respondent city of Cincinnati’s refusal to allow them to have access from the River Road property to a public road constitutes a taking of their property interests. They ask this court to order the city to bring an eminent-domain action to value the interests taken. The city has moved to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- York v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Duncan v. City of Mentor City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- City of Englewood v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Nyland v. Olmsted Falls City CouncilOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State Ex Rel. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Harson Investments, Ltd. v. TroyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.