Legal Opinion

Wessely v. Carrollton School District

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1984No. Docket 73947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs were administrative employees of defendant school district. Wessely was a principal, Zuraw was director of special education, and Acker was a special education supervisor. Plaintiffs were laid off, and sued, contending that defendant’s Board of Education did not comply with the procedural steps spelled out in MCL 380.132; MSA 15.4132 prior to termination of their employment. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and awarded summary judgment to defendant. Plaintiffs appeal as of right. We affirm the trial court’s finding that the procedures specified in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Chester v. Harper Woods School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Perry v. Sturdevant Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Delton Kellogg SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Roberts v. Beecher Community School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Thompson v. Unified School District No. 259Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  4. Sanders v. Delton Kellogg SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Sanders v. Delton Kellogg SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API