Legal Opinion

Marion Machine, Foundry & Supply Co. v. Allen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 5, 1925No. 26,212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Was the plaintiff entitled to enforce a material-man’s lien on an oil and gas leasehold for merchandise furnished by the plaintiff to one who drilled a well on the leasehold? is the question involved in this case.

G. J. Smith and S. J. Polhamus were the owners of the oil and gas leasehold. They entered into a contract with defendant, H. R. *771Allen, on December, 1922, to drill a well upon it. In order to carry on the work of drilling Allen purchased from the plaintiff, the Marion Machine Foundry and Supply Company, certain material and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ball v. Red Square Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. Bankers Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bridgeport Machine Co. v. McKnabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Nolop v. SpettelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Given v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Wilkinson v. Pacific Mid-West Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Mountain Iron & Supply Co. v. BranumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API