Legal Opinion

Marr v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1946Published

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

Plaintiff as administratrix of the estate of her deceásed husband, Arthur Phelps Harr, and individually as his sole legatee and devisee, instituted this action against the defendant Frank for an accounting and a dissolution of the partnership which was entered into by defendant Frank with her deceased husband under a written agreement.

Three causes of action are set forth in the amended complaint. The first is based upon the refusal of the defendant Frank to account to plaintiff for partnership assets and to pay over her share of such assets, after due demand therefor had been made.

In the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schoner v. KoeppelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Leonard v. CammannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API