Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Cammann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The complaint contains three causes of action. The first cause of action is one demanding an accounting. It alleges, in substance, that plaintiff, Middleton Rose, the three defendants named as liquidating partners and one Tappin (not *389a party to this action) were all members of a partnership prior to February 29, 1932; that plaintiff and Tappin withdrew on that date; that later a certain sum was agreed to as plaintiff’s share of the liquid assets; that he had been paid that agreed sum; that assets remained which the Hquidating partners were to collect and distribute; that, included in such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sweet v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Schoner v. KoeppelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Montague Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. O'Brien v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Marr v. FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API