Laffoon v. Hayden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing.
JACKSON, Justice.
Since it appears in Petition for Rehearing that the defendants have misconstrued our opinion herein, we think it desirable to distinguish this case from Phelps v. Young, 149 Okl. 120, 299 P. 461. In that case the relief sought was habeas corpus and custody, and nothing more. We held that an attack upon the validity of an adoption in a habeas corpus proceeding would constitute a collateral attack, which cannot be done, unless the adoption is void on the face of the record. In 2 C.J.S. Adoption of Children § 50a, page 440, the author states:
“An…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Adoption of Howard Clay HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Phelps v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Zupancis v. ZupancisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941