Legal Opinion

Corneal v. McCurdy

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 20, 2020No. 1:19-cv-03393Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MAUREEN K. CORNEAL, * Plaintiff, * Civil Action No. RDB-19-3393 v. * DEBRA MCCURDY, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Maureen K. Corneal (“Plaintiff” or “Corneal”), proceeding pro se, brings this employment discrimination action seeking prospective injunctive relief against Defendants Debra McCurdy, Kurt Schmoke, Maria Rodriguez, and Michelle Williams (collectively, “Defendants”), all in their official capacities as officers of Baltimore City Community College. Corneal alleges unlawful…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API