Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Fontan v. Uhl

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The relator seeks to sustain a writ of habeas corpus, and thereby prevent his deportation.

The government charges the relator with having been convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude, prior to his entry in this country, and is therefore an alien subject to deportation pursuant to section 155 of title 8 of the United States Code Annotated. That portion of the aforesaid section relative to the situation at bar reads as follows: “Any alien who was convicted, or who admits the commission, prior to entry, of a fglony or other crime or misdemeanor involving moral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Zaffarano v. CorsiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Ng Sui Wing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. Svarney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. United States ex rel. Castro v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Ventura v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API