Legal Opinion
Meriwether Supply Co. v. Baugh
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 8, 1927No. 2265PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
'ODOM, J.
Plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the City Court sustaining an exception’of no cause of action against Mrs. Baugh.
The petition alleges that, in the month of August, 1923, the A. & M. Construction Company entered into a contract with Mrs. Baugh for the erection of a building; that said Mrs. Baugh did not cause a written contract for said work to be recorded in the mortgage records of the parish, nor did she require the contractor to furnish bond as required by Act. No. 139 of 1922.
Plaintiff further alleges that it furnished materials and supplies to the contractor for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roark v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Shreveport Mut. Bldg. Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Audubon Homestead Ass'n v. A. Stef Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Alfred Hiller Co. v. Hotel Grunewald Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Louisiana Glass & Mirror Works, Ltd. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lawrence v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Casey v. AllainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Petty v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Salmen Brick & Lumber Co. v. OwenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Central Lumber Co. v. DouglasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930