Legal Opinion
Jose Lozano Arredondo v. Jefferson Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 8, 2017No. 11-72422PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Jose Guadalupe Lozano-Arredondo was denied cancellation of removal based on his conviction for petit theft in the State of Idaho. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) concluded he was ineligible for cancellation because this conviction qualified as an “offense under” 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). That provision says any alien who “is convicted of [1] a crime involving moral turpitude [2] committed within five years ... after the date of admission, and ... [3] for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed, is deportable.” § 1227(a)(2)(A)®. Lozano-Arredondo…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lopez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Maricela Leyva Martinez v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- ORTEGA-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Agustin Ortega-Lopez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.