Schultz v. Champion Welding & Manufacturing Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 15, 1920, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
This appeal is from an order of the Appellate Division, third department, affirming, one of the justices dissenting, an a^vard of the state industrial commission, made to the widow and minor children of Herman G. Schultz, deceased. The award was made upon the theory that Schultz sustained fatal injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment by the Champion Welding and Manufacturing Company. The business of this company was “ welding and machine work.” Schultz was the foreman of its shop and also • looked after certain outside work. Shortly after five o’clock in the afternoon on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of Daly v. . Bates RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Pierson v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Pierson v. . Interborough Rapid Transit CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tallon v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Turner Day & Woolworth Handle Co. v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Fletcher v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Matter of Lampert v. . SiemonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.