Pierson v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Company
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 13, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff was employed as a guard on the defendant’s railroad.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 13, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff was employed as a guard on the defendant’s railroad. On the day of the accident, his train having arrived at its terminal station, he was relieved from duty, another guard took his. place and he walked out of the train, of which his car had been a…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Andrews and Elkus, JJ.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Tallon v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Matter of Clark v. . VoorheesNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Martin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Schultz v. Champion Welding & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.