Legal Opinion

ViChip Corp. v. Tsu-Chang Lee

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 9, 2006No. C 04-2914 PJHPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on May 17, 2006. Plaintiff ViChip Corporation (‘ViChip”) appeared through its counsel, Lesley E. Kothe, Robert Shwarts, and Sean A. Lincoln. Defendant, Dr. Tsu-Chang Lee (“Lee”), appeared through his counsel, G. Whitney Leigh. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as follows, and for the reasons…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  3. Shamrock Foods Co. v. GastDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. NCMIC Finance Corporation v. ArtinoDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
  5. No Cost Conference, Inc. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API