Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Riviere

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1908No. Civ. No. 489PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, allowing attorney’s fees for services rendered to an executor. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edgar E. Lefebvre, McNutt & Hannon, Edward G. Kuster, and Edward L. Hutchinson, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal from an order allowing respondent an attorney’s fee for certain services rendered the executor before and after appointment.

One Louis Riviere died in 1905, leaving an estate exceeding $50,000 in value, before which time he had executed a paper writing purporting to be his last will and testament, in which one Bachmann was named as executor. This will was offered for probate by the executor, who employed respondent, an attorney, for that purpose. A contest was filed by parties interested in the estate, and upon a hearing the will was admitted to probate and letters testamentary issued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Olmstead v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. In re JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Johnston v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Romine v. CralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Mission Film Corp. v. Chadwick Pictures Corp.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Estate of PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Estate of SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API