Smith v. Walker
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Lawrence Cirenit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Petition by Charles E. Smith, against which Henry Walker and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment for remonstrants, petitioner appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The court below, upon appeal, denied appellant’s application for license to retail intoxicating liquors. The overruling of his motion for a new trial has been assigned as error.
The application was for a license to sell intoxicants at a designated place in the third ward of the city of Mitchell, and was refused for the reason that a remonstrance against the granting of any and all such licenses, signed by a majority of the legal voters of Marion township, in which the city of Mitchell is situated, was on file in the office of the county auditor, at the time appellant made his application. It…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Higgins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Prestwood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Oxley v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fesler v. BossonIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Hirth-Krause Co. v. CohenIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Shurman v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Village of St. Johnsbury v. AronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- State v. LegoraTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.