Legal Opinion

Mount v. Krilich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924No. 18727PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action to establish an alleged gift of $2,000 in money, said to have been made by appellant to his two minor nephews. The claim was assigned by the guardian of the minors to respondent for collection. He brought the action as plaintiff. The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict for the defendant. The trial court granted a new trial, from which order the defendant has appealed.

The order granting a new trial was a general one, and ordinarily, as outlined in Sutherland v. Northern Pacific R. Co., 124 Wash. 413, 214 Pac. 823, we could not interfere; but here it is contended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. LamarWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Meyers v. AlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Grass v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Meyer v. CampionWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sturgis v. McElroyWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sellman v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Panos v. SourwineWashington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API