Legal Opinion

Bridgeforth v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1924No. 8 Div. 142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The prosecution was commenced by affidavit in which the defendant was charged with having in her possession “prohibed” liquors contrary to law. A demurrer was interposed to the affidavit, one of the grounds assigned being “that it fails to aver that the defendant had prohibited liquors in her possession contrary to law.”

In Wood v. State, 50 Ala. 144, the indictment charged that the defendant “unlawfully and with malice aforethought”, assaulted another with intent to murder him. The court said:

“No doubt, the county solicitor by a slip of the pen omitted the letter ‘1’ from the word which he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Griffith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Harbin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jinright v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Nix v. City of AndalusiaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Little v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Frazer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Burnett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API