Legal Opinion
United States v. Sensient Colors, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 12, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1275PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the United States of America’s (“the Government”) motion to strike Defendant Sen-sient Colors’ (“Sensient”) affirmative defenses in this action brought under § 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Cleanup, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). Oral argument was heard on July 17, 2008. For the following reasons, as well as those placed on the record at oral argument, the Court grants in part and denies in part the Government’s motion.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
According to the Complaint, from approximately 1922 to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Rochelle Saks v. Franklin Covey Co. And Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- United States v. Marisol, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eisai Co., Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- United States v. Sensient Colors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Dann v. Lincoln National Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. GerberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.