Cuddy v. Clement
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the DisJrict of Massachusetts.
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners in this case, now the appellants, were coal suppliers, doing business under the name of Cuddy-Mullen Coal Company. The rule of law which governs the parties was laid down by our opinion rendered on February 2, 1900, in The Iris, 40 C. C. A. 301, 100 Fed. 104, 106, 110. The Iris was reaffirmed by us in 41 C. C. A. 679, 101 Fed. 1006, and it came before the supreme court on a petition for certiorari, which was denied, under the title of Woodworth v. Nute, 179 U. S. 682, 21 Sup. Ct. 915, 45 L. Ed. 194. The portions of the opinion in The Iris, 40 C. C. A.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moran v. SturgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The St. Jago De Cuba. Vinente, and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- The Emily SouderSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- The ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ely v. Murray & Tregurtha Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1912
- The South CoastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- The James T. FurberDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1904
- Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Metropolitan S. S. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1908
- The UnderwriterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.