Home Savings Bank v. Rolando

I do not agree with either the reasoning or the conclusion in the opinion of the court. The question at issue is whether the service of the writ of attachment, which the plaintiff caused to be issued on September 12, 1928, as a writ of mesne process, and which on the next day was served on the members of a partnership, Pettine, Godfrey and Cambio, as garnishees of the defendants, and statutory notice of which was given to the defendants, must be held to be nugatory, simply because of two facts. The first is that at that time no service in the State on the defendants, nonresidents, had been…