Ex Parte Mabry

I agree with the Court’s result but I disagree with its analysis. I therefore concur only in the result.

I

In 1991, Andrew Michael Mabry was convicted of burglary of a habitation for *61actions committed in 1990. He was paroled and revoked twice. Upon revocation, prison officials declined to give him credit for the time he spent on parole. Prison officials also concluded that Ma-bry’s offense was not eligible for mandatory supervision. Mabry filed this writ application arguing that he is entitled to credit for his street time and that his offense should be designated as eligible for mandatory…