Denver Producing & Ref. Co. v. Campbell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, 0.
There are seven assignments of error made for reversal of this case, but all are embraced under two propositions in the briefs. The first of these is;
“The trial court committed error in holding that -plaintiff in error had failed tof comply with the terms of the oil and gas mining lease involved in this action.”
This being an equitable.-action, this court is authorized to consider -and weigh the evidence, together with all inferences and conclusions to be reasonably drawn therefrom, and to affirm, reverse, or render, as equity and the rights of the parties, as disclosed by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce Oil Corporation v. SchachtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Lee v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Pevehouse v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Marshall v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hart v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Crude Oil Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Sealy v. PoundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Stein v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932