Legal Opinion

Denver Producing & Ref. Co. v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1926No. 16671PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, 0.

There are seven assignments of error made for reversal of this case, but all are embraced under two propositions in the briefs. The first of these is;

“The trial court committed error in holding that -plaintiff in error had failed tof comply with the terms of the oil and gas mining lease involved in this action.”

This being an equitable.-action, this court is authorized to consider -and weigh the evidence, together with all inferences and conclusions to be reasonably drawn therefrom, and to affirm, reverse, or render, as equity and the rights of the parties, as disclosed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pierce Oil Corporation v. SchachtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Lee v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Pevehouse v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Marshall v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Hart v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Crude Oil Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Sealy v. PoundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Stein v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API