Legal Opinion
Rosa v. Walter Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.
Motion for an order increasing the ad damnum clauses of the complaint and the amount of damages *379claimed in the original bill of particulars. The application is based upon the fact that since the service of the complaint and bill of particulars, there has been a continuing permanent disability with consequent increase in loss of earnings and other special damages, due to the passage of time. There has been no change in the nature of the injuries originally claimed.
The summons and complaint in this action were served on October 20, 1955. The bill of particulars is dated March 31, 1958. Although…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Feldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Nathanson v. Lutheran Hospital Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Dimowitz v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Groeber v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- D'Andressi v. Carolson Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Wyman v. MoroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969