Legal Opinion

Lee v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & Paroles

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This is an appeal from the trial court’s review of the Board’s revocation of Neil Lee’s parole and suspended sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Neil Lee (Lee) pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance on October 10, 2002. He was sentenced to ten years in the South Dakota Penitentiary, with five of those years suspended contingent on his compliance with various conditions of suspension. After serving approximately two years of his sentence, Lee was offered parole. As a condition of parole, Lee was required to sign a supervision agreement. Condition 8 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GoodwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Weber v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Turo v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Smith v. Board of Pardons and ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Grajczyk v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huber v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Austad v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Williams v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Martin v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API