Carter v. State

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

Appellant D’Andre Theophlouis Carter was convicted of malice murder and associated crimes in connection with the shooting death of Dequavious Reed.1 On appeal, Carter contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, that the trial court erroneously admitted a portion of a recorded conversation which captured the statements of a third party who did not testify at trial, and that the trial court erroneously admitted a recording of a jailhouse telephone call made by Carter. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Viewing the evidence in a light most…