Legal Opinion

Statler v. United States Savings & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1937No. Appeal, 14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Mr. Statler, who made the oral argument in his owu behalf, sued to recover the balance of deposits amounting to $630. They were time deposits subject to withdrawal on written notice. Judgment for the defendant was entered for want of a sufficient reply to new matter. The Superior Court affirmed. *

The facts are set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court and need not be repeated here.

As the depositor became a creditor of the bank by depositing his money, we deem it immaterial, in passing on this appeal, whether he gave oral notice on January 10th of intention to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Columbia National Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Summers v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Myers v. LohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Statler v. United States Savings & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Teachers' Tenure Act CasesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Bloch v. BartmanPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API