Legal Opinion

C.M. Thibodaux Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 10, 1989No. Civ. A. Nos. 88-1301, 88-4716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKER, District Judge.

Cross motions for summary judgment were heard by the Court on an earlier date. After considering the briefs and arguments of counsel, the applicable law and for reasons which follow, the Court GRANTS the defendant’s motion for summary judgment; the Court DENIES the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

Summary judgment is appropriate when:

the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The C.M. Thibodaux Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Mathews v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API