Legal Opinion
Nasca v. County of Suffolk
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 26, 2013No. 09-cv-00023 (WFK)(ETB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ II, District Judge.
Dean Nasca (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action pro se against the County of Suffolk, Police Officer Michael Conklin, Peter Frank, William G. Ford, and John Does 1-10 (collectively “Defendants”) in connection with a series of incidents which began when Plaintiff was issued a traffic summons for failure to wear a seatbelt in violation of New York State Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1229-c(3). Plaintiff seeks recovery under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986, and 1988 for violation of his rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Favourite v. 55 Halley St., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Favourite v. 55 Halley Street, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019