Cecil v. Connecticut Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The jury might reasonably have found these facts: The trolley-car of the defendant came to a stop on the north-bound track just beyond Windsor Street in Waterbury, and three passengers alighted therefrom: one, Leggett, alighted from the front exit, passed in front of this car and thence across the south-bound track; another, the plaintiff, on alighting, looked north for an approaching car on the southbound track and saw none. The range of his vision was cut off by the car he had alighted from., for the distance of one thousand feet north. Having looked to the north, he turned and passed over…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Russell v. VergasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Spagnola v. New Method Laundry CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930