Austin v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, Judge
The number of occasions on which we are asked to invoke the “plain error” exemption from the otherwise foreclosing effect of non-preservation through failure to object remains so epidemic that it behooves us periodically, as forcefully as we know how, to do what we can to limit the contagion. Maryland Rule 4-325(e) states the basic and simple principle with unmistakable clarity:
“No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless the party objects on the record promptly after the court instructs the jury, stating distinctly the matter to which the party…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Squire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- State v. EarpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Morris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Wieland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- State v. FunkhouserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Bates & Beharry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. GrossCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.