Legal Opinion

Lund v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, INC.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1960No. 9119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs sued for damages to the paint on their automobiles alleged to have been caused by some deleterious substance in the smoke and soot emitted from a flare stack at defendant’s oil refinery at Woods Cross, Utah. From adverse jury verdict and judgment entered thereon defendant appeals.

Defendant challenges the verdict and the propriety of submitting the case to the jury under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur on these bases: that there is no proof that the soot came from its flare stack; nor that it was negligent in its operations; but that, on the contrary,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Newton v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Jensen v. Denver & Rio Grande Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Alvarado v. TuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Joseph v. W. H. Groves Latter-Day Saints HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. Cal Gas Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  2. Anderton v. MontgomeryUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Universal Investment Company v. Carpets, IncorporatedUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Kusy v. K-Mart Apparel Fashion Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Witort v. United States Rubber Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API