Waltham State Bank v. Tuttle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
This is an action on a promissory note dated March 1, 1918, due in three years, made by the defendants Tuttle and Allem to the defendants Babcock and Lewis. Lewis transferred his interest in the note to Babcock, who transferred to defendant Decker, who transferred to the plaintiff bank. Allem was not served and did not appear. Tuttle was served but did not appear. There was a verdict against Tuttle, Babcock and Decker, but not against Lewis. The verdict against Tuttle and Decker was directed by the court. The defendants Babcock and Decker appeal from orders denying their separate motions for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keller v. State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Board of County Commissioners v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Washington Finance Corp. v. GlassWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Mechanics' American National Bank v. HelmbacherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Sawyer State Bank v. SutherlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schmidt v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943