Legal Opinion

Villain v. Civil Service Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1941No. S. F. No. 16380PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, J., pro tem.

The defendants, Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco et al., appeal from a declaratory judgment decreeing that plaintiffs are the holders of permanent civil service positions as *853general clerk stenographer in the public welfare department of the city and county, and ordering their reinstatement in such positions, and the payment of their salaries at the rate of $150 a month, less sums earned, together with any increase provided by law, from respective dates of their purported discharges in the fall of 1938 and spring of 1939. The main question on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. McGilllicuddy v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Rodgers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Napa v. EasterbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Doerr v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evelyn Jenkins v. County of Riverside Kenneth B. Cohen, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Jenkins v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Duskin v. State Board of Dry CleanersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Butler v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API